Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Kirshenbaum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Kirshenbaum[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Routine PR executive riddled with a non notable agency's "milestones" Yogiile (talk) 18:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and New York. Shellwood (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete highly promotional article that's way off the mark. If this survives AfD, someone had better come up with a good source supporting the concept that he's a "best selling author", because judging by the amazon situation, that's a reality-stretch even for an advertising executive. Elemimele (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy - he might be notable, but the fluff is way up. It's almost so bad as to start from scratch. If he wrote it himself, he's terrible as a writer. If he paid for this, he was robbed. Bearian (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Worth userfying?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete − The article's creator has an apparent connection to one of Kirshenbaum's companies. Painting17 (talk) 22:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.