Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard K. Lublin Teaching Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 00:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richard K. Lublin Teaching Award[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article on an award within a single university. Some of the individual who have received it are notable, but most are not--they're junior faculty or "professors of Practice", not researchers who would be notable under WP:PROF. It is possible for a professor to be notable for teaching, but that would require a national level award, not an award like this. I see no evidence that anyone outside of the particular university has any interest in this or has written any usable sources. The only non-Duke sources are the personal web pages of awardees who have now moved elsewhere . DGG ( talk ) 22:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, most teaching awards are not major awards, and are thus not notable, so delete. Bearian (talk) 18:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks independent sources. Out of some 34 references or external links the only ones not generated from within the university that gives this award to one of their faculty members are 3 ex-Duke faculty CV's at other universities and a Youtube link. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.