Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard J. Stillman II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep and expand. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard J. Stillman II[edit]

Does nothing to establish the gentleman's notablity-- is the professor of public administration at the University of Colorado notable enough to have his own Wikipedia article? ekedolphin 05:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the nomination because as it stands the article is rather poor. Yet he is a published author of some academic books which is mentioned in the article, and a look at this Amazon page seems to indicate that when it comes to notability, this professor seems to pass WP:PROFTEST. Keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:13, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but expand should be marked as stub. As per Sjakkalle. In fact one of his books is cited as further reading in Wikipedia article on Dwight Waldo. Paddles 15:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. [Google search for this name] returns plenty of non-blog hits for his books and papers. I had to look to be sure this wasn't really Richard M. Stallman of the Free Software Foundation. Barno 17:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.224.208 (talk • contribs)
Keep and expand. 24 items in the Library of Congress catalogue, all from good publishers. His American bureaucracy has been published in three editions, and Public administration: concepts and cases in six editions. u p p l a n d 07:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everyone. JeffBurdges 11:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand; he's definitely notable. Runcorn 20:04, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.