Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Goodall Gallery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Goodall Gallery[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to me to be an essentially promotional article about a non-notable commercial gallery. It's covered with "citation needed" and "unrefereneced" tags, most of the existing references are about the people exhibited rather than the place, so I believe WP:NOTINHERITED applies, many of the listed people shown are redlinked, and most importantly my search threw up little other than the gallery's own site or blogs. TheLongTone (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now I suppose and I would've commented earlier but I wanted to wait to hear from others and my searches found nothing particularly good with only coverage such as this. SwisterTwister talk 07:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TheLongTone's arguments. --Theredproject (talk) 20:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nominator. New Media Theorist (talk) 22:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.