Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Gentile
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. لennavecia 16:49, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Richard Gentile[edit]
- Richard Gentile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non Notable. No disrespect intended, but Dr. Gentile is not a particular noteworthy practicioner in our field. Criteria for inclusion as a medical professional should be reserved for those with extraordinary career accomplishments, notable academic or professional standing, or other claims of celebrity status or accomplishment outside the field of medicine. The bloat of wikipedia entries among my speciality seems to be more vanity entries or part of marketing strategiesDroliver (talk) 20:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I didn't find an assertion of notability that met our guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:20, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A mention in Vogue and a cameo on tv doesn't get it. I'm sure he's very qualified, but that's his job. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't find anything to back claims on page, and its only a cameo if you're famous in the first place. Second, article contains patently wrong promotional material (the part about being one of only 13 dual board certified surgeons). Fuzbaby (talk) 20:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete.Biophys (talk) 02:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is just a promotion. No WP:RS mentions the subject; fails WP:BIO. Johnuniq (talk) 08:12, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.