Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Felix (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (X! · talk) · @082 · 00:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Felix[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject doesn't appear to be particularly notable in his field. There are no references, and his 'official website' is a deadlink Oo7565 (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Google News throws up plenty of coverage ([1]).--Michig (talk) 06:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comment this was up for afd last summer but no one voted so no consensus was reach. I just thought to put this up for consensus thats allOo7565 (talk) 06:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are references on Google.—KeptSouth (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A cursory click on google news alone brings up multiple sources, clicking one at random brings up the BBC Website saying "The 60-year-old paranormal expert rose to international fame thanks to his appearances on Living TV's Most Haunted programme." in the article. I'd never heard of him, but then again I have no reason to have wanted to. He appears to be of interest to people with an interest in woo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amentet (talk • contribs) 21:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.