Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Adlam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 09:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Adlam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a musician and producer without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Sourcing in the article consists of his management company, and an Allmusic profile. My own search for sources turns up album credit listings and little else. The best I could find for notability was this interview from a site which may not meet the criteria for a reliable source. Whpq (talk) 23:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe delete as there's no evidence of even the slightest good third-party coverage and it seems the best results I found was this. SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not seem to pas WP:MUSICIAN. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.