Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Lacsamana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo Lacsamana[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged with notability issues since 2009. There is one reference, which is a deadlink. I cannot find anything to add. Artist does not appear to meet WP:ARTIST. Tacyarg (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing at all found in a search.--- Possibly (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I found some images of his paintings on social media sites, with no context whether or not these are in important collections or exhibitions. No record of an exhibition record or publications about this artist. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 09:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is one reference. There are more, but they are very poorly formatted. The article makes the claim that his one of his works is published in the Encyclopedia of Philippine Art. Presumably, that is the CCP Encyclopedia of Philippine Art, which, in addition to a print edition also has a digital edition at https://epa.culturalcenter.gov.ph/encyclopedia/. Vexations (talk) 12:13, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.