Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Alvarez-Diaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:38, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo Alvarez-Diaz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and references questioned for over 20 months. Subject is a (relatively) young architecture graduate and partner in a design firm. 2 sources in article, one is written by the subject, the other may or may not contain in-depth coverage of Alvarez-Diaz. Judging by a Google search there is no evidence pointing towards notability, only listings and the occasional mention in a couple of online news articles. Does not seem enough to substantiate a WP article. NB the original author is 'Ricalvarez', strangely similar name to the subject! Sionk (talk) 00:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no clear claim of notability in the article. Being a working architect is not a claim to notability. There is no indication of awards, or major works that have attracted critical attention. There is no significant coverage about him in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 05:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with Whpq. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarvis Sherbourne (talk • contribs)
Delete No indication of wp:notability. One ref is self written, the other is vague and includes a wikilink in the reference. Ability to meet wp:notability looks unlikely. North8000 (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.