Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rica Ethier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G3 as an obvious hoax. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rica Ethier[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure child actor autobiography; so garbled that I cannot detect any valid assertion of notability Orange Mike | Talk 17:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Social media as sources?!? MaskedSinger (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing here is an article-clinching notability claim, the references are entirely to social networking profiles rather than reliable sources, and this is written in such incoherent English ("The network announced that leave to agent expect to "body-pain" and "crying serye" since leave to network") that I literally can't make heads or tails of what it's even trying to say. To be perfectly honest, I actually suspect a total WP:HOAX, even if I don't have the depth of knowledge of the Philippine media ecosystem to prove that. Bearcat (talk) 21:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources at all, and Googling doesn't produce any. William2001^(talk) 21:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A child actor would not be switching Filipino networks like this as if they were a journeyman outfielder, nor this many roles (even for the Philippines, the authorities would have intervened). This simply seems to be a Filipino TV fan playing pretend online that they're inescapable on Filipino TV, and they've never appeared on any television network in the country. Nate • (chatter) 01:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not any reliable sources. - MA Javadi (talk) 15:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Not notable. Maybe another random kid who just created a hoax article about herself. -WayKurat (talk) 03:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Rechecked every edit of this user (including those edits from tl.wiki and the social media accounts that were used as sources), the user based this hoax TV personality to Amy Perez. I would also recommend to block this user for editing here in en.wiki. -WayKurat (talk) 03:36, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.