Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riasat Ali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Riasat Ali[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An apparent BLP about a figure in cricket and politics who does not appear to satisfy WP:NCRIC or WP:NPOL. The best argument for notability I can come up with is that he satisfies NPOL by having held state/province–wide office by being general secretary of the Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee. Except that (1) I cannot find a single source to verify that claim; and (2) even assuming it is true, I am skeptical that a state-level party official counts as notable by this standard.

As for the cricket arguments, he turns up as an also-ran in this article and a few carbon copies of it about the fallout from the Lodha Committee. He never played professional cricket, as far as I know. Rather, he had various positions in the Uttar Pradesh Cricket Association. I'm not sure how to treat a sport official under NCRIC—I'm tempted to view notability for sport officials as analogous to notability for politicians. In which case, as a state-level cricket official, he might be notable, but I cannot find enough WP:SIGCOV to back that up.

Flagging that I just moved the article from "Riasatali", which seemed incorrect given how the name is spelled in the article. It's a clear autobio; creator Riasataliofficial is indef blocked. Tagged for notability since 2013; PROD—quite reasonably—declined in 2016. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think NPOL applies for non-governmental offices like party positions and cricket associations, that too for a state unit. We can only go by GNG, on which the subject seems to fail. --Ab207 (talk) 20:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. StickyWicket (talk) 22:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero evidence of notability Spiderone 13:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.