Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhos-Engan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rhos-Engan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable Rathfelder (talk) 08:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 08:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 08:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be complete unnotable. The article states nearly nothing and provides no real sources. MB 03:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication, and searches did not reveal, how it passes WP:GNG, and certainly doesn't pass WP:GEOFEAT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.