Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhode Island Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Non Admin Close. Dusti^{talk to me} 18:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rhode Island Mall[edit]

From the text, this mall has less than 10 stores open in a two story mall and is dying. It seems to have no assertion of notability and be more of a comparision between this mall and the more notable Warwick Mall. Does not appear to meet WP:N. Doesn't even have a website. Collectonian (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm a Rhode Islander and I can confirm that there is only 10 stores in the whole mall. This article is full of original research and a comparison of the near-by (literally in walking distance) Warwick Mall. Fails WP:N Doc Strange^{Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole}Strange Frequencies 16:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per this and a few other sources. The latter source claims it to be New England's first two-story mall; if that ain't notable, I don't know what is. I'll fix up the page once I'm awake. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Thanks to TenPoundHammer it has the sources to just barely pass WP:N according to those guidelines (I didn't know that Deadmalls.com could be used as a source, because otherwise I would've fixed up this page a few months ago when I initially came across it). The original research has been cleaned up and the comparison has been taken out. It's certainly dying (I was in there a few days ago. I still have no clue how its still staying open). I really need to start finding sources for AfDs especially for things like this that are so close to me. Doc Strange^{Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole}Strange Frequencies 15:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's weird, one of the sources has been hacked. Oh well, I'll leave it in for now, surely it'll be fixed soon. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could easily add the deadmalls.com source which is here to the page. Doc Strange^{Mailbox Orbitting Black Hole}Strange Frequencies 17:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Ten Pound Hammer's efforts to improve the article. Bravo! NOTE: Iad to remove the associated content link from TPH's post as it was preventing me from saving the page and was taking me to some spam filter error page instead. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.