Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhinoceros Tap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 00:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rhinoceros Tap[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an album which just asserts its existence, and makes no substantive or properly sourced claim that it actually passes WP:NALBUMS in any substantive way — the only real evidence of notability here is "one of the musicians involved in it has a Wikipedia article", but that isn't enough to make an album independently notable. Albums get over on sales chart positions, award nominations, reliable source coverage that's actually about the album itself, and on and so forth — they do not get a free notability pass just because they exist. Delete unless proper sourcing, supporting a substantive claim of notability, can be added. Bearcat (talk) 21:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There are a good number of G-hits (most including the word "delightful") but nothing I would consider an independent, reliable source. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 06:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 01:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 02:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks sources to establish notability. Existence ≠ notabiity. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:52, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.