Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhino Africa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rhino Africa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:NCORP. There is coverage but it is all general announcements and brief mentions, nothing in-depth. The current version, if kept, would also need a substantial rewrite to remove the promotional tone. CNMall41 (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 06:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 06:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 06:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, tell me how I can improve providing in-depth content on this article, as I am still new to Wikipedia and still learning. Concerning the promotional content I tried to take only the information provided in the references. GauthierPerreux (talk) 8:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Keep It needs work, but I think the Entrepreneur Magazine article, the NewsWatch show, and the World Travel Awards received support keeping it. Schazjmd (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You linked to a press release which is never viable for notability. The Entrepreneur piece is not Entrepreneur Magazine. It licenses the name from Entrepreneur but it is unknown what their editorial standards are. I am not sure what you mean by the awards publication so I cannot opine on the relevance. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete entirely promotional. Not WP:NCORP Lubbad85 (☎) 17:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacks the necessary in-depth, independent, significant coverage to meet WP:NCORP (and thus WP:CORPDEPTH). Per the aforementioned policy, sources based on primary information and trivial mentions do not confer undue notability on the topic. In addition, off-wiki evidence (the creating editor's username crossed with the company's name) indicates the article has been created contrary to WP:NOTADVERTISING.--SamHolt6 (talk) 02:25, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch on the UDE, SamHolt6. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND and WP:NCORP. Promotional. scope_creep^Talk 22:02, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.