Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reza Seyf Ahmadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reza Seyf Ahmadi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been in place for over 2 years and Ahmadi has still not made their debut. According to Soccerway, SofaScore and BeSoccer, his career has consisted of sitting on the bench once as an unused substitute. FlashScore has nothing.

Nothing in the Persian article indicates notability and searches of "رضا سیف‌احمدی" yield only passing mentions like Varzesh3, which fail to meet the standards required for WP:GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 14:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Without prejudice to change vote to Keep if significant coverage is later found. For my search, I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for the subject, noting that someone with searching skills for Iranian/Persian sources might uncover things I was unable to. Until that point, my vote stands as delete. GauchoDude (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom --Mardetanha (talk) 11:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks to fail WP:GNG, and no evidence they'll actually make any appearances anytime soon. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.