Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reyner, Lord of Burgh Castle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reyner, Lord of Burgh Castle[edit]
- Reyner, Lord of Burgh Castle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The only source offered for this article is a book which the editor concerned (User:Burkem) says is unpublished; it is therefore not WP:V verifiable. Many (if not all) of this user's edits rely on genealogical material from discredited sources, and the user has now been blocked. This nomination follows the removal by Burkem of an earlier PROD; see the discussion at User talk:Burkem#Undoing_the_damage, where a major cleanup is underway. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete original research per nom; nothing in this article can be relied upon and the main reason for creating it and claim to notability (supposedly the father of Hubert de Burgh and William de Burgh) is quite wrong. What's left is a genealogical entry, and Wikipedia isn't for those. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. As above. - Kittybrewster 14:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per Angus McLellan ~~ Phoe talk 14:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC) ~~ [reply]
- Delete per nominator, one in a series of non-verifiable articles created by an editor who was recently banned for repeatedly posting hoaxes. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above, this article and any of its imaginary descendants. Tubezone 07:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: see User:Burkem/review_list for an annotated listing of this users's edits. Any help in completing the process would be welcome! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — unreliable contribution. — ERcheck (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and see Walter, Lord of Burgh Castle, John, Lord of Burgh Castle and Lord of Burgh Castle -- lucasbfr talk 18:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.