Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rex (dog)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep How anyone could think these articles aren't about notable topics is beyond me; each is reasonably sourced. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rex (dog)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates notability requirements. Being related to a notable person in itself confers no degree of notability upon that person. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Family

Also:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Conmatrix (talk • contribs)

Keep article appears sufficiently referenced to establish notability. Artw (talk) 02:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree with Artw. Plenty of reliable sources here. Notability doesn't seem to be in question. --Bfigura ^(talk) 02:51, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Provides good, sufficient sources. Meets the notability requirements easily, covered in the mainstream media. coeliacus. (talk.) 03:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.