Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revosiete (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 03:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revosiete[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability per WP:BAND, no WP:RS, only links to trivial or self-published sources. Previous AFD "lacked consensus" due to only contributors contesting. CSD twice, removed without further discussion. Please re-read WP:GARAGEBAND --Animalparty-- (talk) 05:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, only one contributor contesting, but also no one voting for deletion even after two relistings. A nomination alone does not a consensus make. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable band. Google, using the Verbatim option (to avoid websites with users named "revo7", for example), gives around 40 hits, none of them independent reliable sources. Also, nothing in the article indicates that the group would meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. The first reference requires login and the others aren't reliable sources for establishing notability. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable band per WP:BAND. No independent coverage. No charted singles or albums. I agree that WP:GARAGEBAND fits this case here. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.