Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolve (translation group)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:01, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revolve (translation group)[edit]

A group of hentai fans whose only claim to notability is that they're translating some games into English. Fails WP:V, since the only sources for their claims are their own website and some other fansites; also fails WP:VAIN, since the page seems to have been created by a member of the group. If this information belongs in Wikipedia, it is as a footnote on the pages for the games in question, not as a separate article. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirror Moon. ArcherXRin 11:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I vote Delete as nominator. ArcherXRin 11:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --UsaSatsui 12:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge key details into articles on the games, where we have them. Most of the rest probably is unverifiable. On notability, see my comments above on the Mirror Moon AfD: there's no clear precedent that I know of. — Haeleth Talk 14:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article; there does exist a separate "dating sims and visual novels wiki" out there, and it strikes me that an article like this would very much be welcome at a place like that, but clearly, as the original poster states above, this fails WP:V and WP:VAIN in the context of Wikipedia. I do have a confict of interests to declare -- I am the lead translator of another such group, called "insani". I should like to note, though, that every single one of the edits I have committed to Wikipedia thus far have acted to strike out my group's name where I found the mention to fail WP:V as above. I believe that I am being as impartial as I can be with this vote. --Gp32 14:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. RasputinAXP c 15:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. RGTraynor 16:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete V concerns. Kotepho 19:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.