Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revival rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revival rock[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only references are to another Wikipedia article and a dictionary definition; no clear indication this topic is notable enough to have separate treatment. older ≠ wiser 10:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete referenced only to Wikipedia, no evidence that this is a recognised genre. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unreferenced and likely WP:MADEUP. De728631 (talk) 12:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a notable concept. Seems like it might be an advert for the mentioned (non-notable) bands. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.