Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revival Soy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revival Soy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable soy supplement. They apparently like to donate samples of their products to scientific studies (see, e.g., [1]) but I'm not seeing WP:SIGCOV of the company. Refs to those studies are a large quantity of the refs in the article; the others are largely to unreliable "bizjournals.com". I found a single article in the Winston-Salem Journal from October 26, 2003 called "Soy Successful" which is about the company, but (1) I don't have access to the whole thing; and (2) I don't think this one article is enough for notability. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 06:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 06:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 06:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 06:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This certainly reads like an advertisement - and the references appear to be original research. The author has only edited one article here. Other references are few and far between in places like the history of soy foods and flours, etcetera. Whiteguru (talk) 08:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.