Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reuven Mosheev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was G11'd. by Alex Shih ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reuven Mosheev[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have done "Due diligence" - in Wikipedia terms, WP:BEFORE - about this article, and I have found nothing that would persuade me that Mr Mosheevmeets the WP:ANYBIO test. With respect to VK (social networking) it would appear to me that Mr Mosheev's links appear tenuous at best. Shirt58 (talk) 11:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Self promotional fluff piece.PRehse (talk) 09:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This should have been Speedy Delete (CSD A7), but since an AfD has started, it must now sit for a week waiting for the AfD to close. Loopy30 (talk) 13:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Fails WP:BIO - (at least the AFD will allow Speedy G4 if it is recreated) - Arjayay (talk) 09:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no verified claim of significance for A7 or rs coverage fails WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 19:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Page has now been deleted by Alex Shih (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) on 05:58, 3 September 2017. Loopy30 (talk) 14:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.