Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return of the Ghostbusters (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g4, see deletion after 2nd afd. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Return of the Ghostbusters[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Return of the Ghostbusters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article asserts almost no notability through reliable sources, and does not have sufficient notability to have its own article. Deserves at most a one sentence mention in the Ghostbusters franchise article under cultural impact. THIS ARTICLE HAS ALSO BEEN SUCCESSFULLY AFD'D TWICE. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If we can't find a realiable sourse for it. Buc (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I'm unfamiliar with topic so trying to look at it as an impartial observer; Seems to be non-notable, references are IMDB (see WP:NF) and local media. "Cultural References" is reading like a long Trivia section so the article needs a clean up if it is kept. Already failed two AfD's so a precedent has been set. - JVG (talk) 22:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cross the Streams - film fails WP:NF by not having significant coverage in outside sources. The one source that might have had something (it looked like a Denver newspaper) was a broken link. As noted by Burwellian, imdb does not bestow notability, and if it has been knocked twice, its return should include the needed sources, which it doesn't. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and possibly salt. Could have been CSD under recreation of deleted material, I think. Darrenhusted (talk) 15:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per WP:SD#G4, seeing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return of the Ghostbusters (2nd nomination). Agree with salting, too. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.