Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return of the Flying Tigers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Return of the Flying Tigers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is there even such thing as a flying tiger? I doubt it. This may be a hoax. And even if it isn't, Flying Tigers returning to an area hardly describs notability

Speedy keep Nomination is blatant vandalism. Strikerforce (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain. I don't understand. Why is this vandalism. If anything the article is? Please help me. Sanks Uconnjoseph (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The contribution history of this account suggests a vandalism-only account and has been reported as such to AIV. Strikerforce (talk) 17:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but not speedy. The vandal, oddly enough, while not articulating it properly, has an arguable notability point, but I think it's sufficiently notable to keep. Nevertheless, I don't think it's appropriate to do a speedy closure. --Nlu (talk) 17:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Argument that elements of a fictional work aren't real, even if advanced in good faith, isn't a rational rationale for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It appears that the nominator did not bother to read the article, otherwise s/he would know that the "Flying Tigers" is a name of a fighter plane unit. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 02:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.