Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retropalooza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retropalooza[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG - is reliant on primary sources and other unreliable sources (Facebook) Dan arndt (talk) 12:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Events, and Texas. Dan arndt (talk) 12:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The Fort Worth newspaper cited already in the article seems a RS, and this from a Dallas newspaper [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 14:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Although the Dallas Observer says they may earn a commission if you click on a link bla bla, maybe not the best sourcing. Still a !weak keep I think. Oaktree b (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the Fort Worth Star-Telegram clippings for verification. Timur9008 (talk) 21:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: Just added 2 more sources,and just removed one facebook linkLeomk0403 (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 00:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dallas Observer source cited here is not a significant coverage ("Another big pop culture convention is the Arlington-based Retropalooza, celebrating all things retro in the worlds of toys, music and video games. The two-day event also encourages cosplay and includes guest panelists."). Fort Worth Star-Telegram's source [2] is somewhat better, but sadly turns the focus off of Retropalooza to MetalJesusRocks after one paragraph. I was unable to find more in my searches, fails WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Jovanmilic97. This is mostly sourced to FaceBook, without proper sources to qualify as significant coverage. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find one instance of WP:SIGCOV but it lacks sufficient coverage to be notable besides that. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Jovanmilic97.Fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.