Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retrogames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. The rules are indeed badly written on this, but the nominator's word is enough to withdraw. Thanks for deciding to take care of the work yourself, Muhandes. Let me know if you get hit by a meteorite or some other obstacle comes up. --Kiz o r 11:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrogames[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of these is notable in itself. Muhandes (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, redirect to Retrogaming. --Muhandes (talk) 21:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, I'm going to do some cleanup, move relevant information to Retrogaming, and redirect. (I couldn't find anything in the guidelines, anything else I need to do to withdraw beside this message?) --Muhandes (talk) 08:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to retrogaming. Muhandes, you may wish to withdraw your deletion nomination and just do the redirect yourself. --erachima talk 23:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. And add {{Cleanup}}. It needs editing, not deleting. patsw (talk) 23:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.