Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retro Fusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retro Fusion[edit]

Crystal ballism, yet to be published (and non-notable) magazine. Spam to boot. I would have used {{prod}} but there were already speedy tags that were placed, removed, etc. Ifnord 04:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Bobby1011 04:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable, once circulation is notable then an entry would probably survive, but not until then. --light darkness^(talk) 04:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 04:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wikispam. Phr 04:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 05:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. psch e mp | talk 06:31, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Maustrauser 12:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Mecanismo | Talk 17:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable future magazine. MartinRe 14:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Have suggested to author that it might be better merging several of the topics he's just created under one article, rather than create separate articles for each. MartinRe 14:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.