Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retro Force (The Video Game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 05:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retro Force (The Video Game)[edit]
- Retro Force (The Video Game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable and unverified. PROD (not mine) removed by creator without explanation. Drmies (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Like all games of its age the vast majority if not all relevant sources are magazines (like this). Even then, there's at least one good source online here. Someoneanother 22:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – also featured and reviewed in the April 1999 issue of Dutch magazine Power Unlimited (6 out of 10). –MuZemike 00:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 04:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep video game from a notable publisher which, although Euro-only, appears to have amassed the requisite amount of reliable source coverage for our needs. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.