Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retired Ottawa, Ontario transit fleet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 20:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retired Ottawa, Ontario transit fleet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:NOT - a list of train data, sourced to another wiki and an Angelfire page, with no claim of encyclopedic importance power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be a directory without an text. I think it has its place in an encyclopedia, but this doesn't appear to be that place. SportingFlyer talk 06:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete, not an important/notable subject. As nom says, fails on grounds of having WP:OR Nightfury 14:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. WP:NOTDIR WP:FANCRUFT. Article creation appears to be a response to this edit on OC Transpo: [1]. Ajf773 (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDIR. We don't even care about obsessively maintaining make and model catalogues of the active bus fleets of municipal transit systems, let alone documenting the make and model of every bus they used to have but don't anymore. This is unverifiable trivia, which isn't even interesting let alone encyclopedic — and it's "referenced" entirely to a user-generated trainspotter wiki and a list on an unreliable self-published Angelfire site (who knew Angelfire was even still a thing?), which are not reliable sources for the purposes of making something notable. Bearcat (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.