Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restless Heart (Novel)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Restless Heart (Novel)[edit]
- Restless Heart (Novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely non-referenced, possible self-promotion, and possibly created by the book's author, User:T-Billiam (speculation: a name somewhat similar to T. William, albeit a possible Greek β grapheme replaced for the "W" in his last name), whose self-started biographical article, T. William Phillips is also being considered for deletion as self-promotion. Article's subject is a self-published book. Reviews for the book can be found on the T. William Phillips article (why they aren't being used on this article is unknown) and are being considered non-notable due to their pay-for-review status. Quick Google search brings up only results for a band, album, lyrics. Direct conflict with Wikipedia:Notability_(books)#Self-publication. Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 19:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are obviously extremely concerned with T. William Phillips and his novel, Restless Heart for rather unwarranted reasons. Surely some obscure article on Wikipedia of all places is far more worthy of your time and concentration than my own, and it's obviously much more important to you than it is to me, so please delete. I have no desire to tend to it. Enjoy your wasted days searching for articles to disapprove of. I don't know what the credible and esteemed Wikipedia would be without you. T-Billiam (talk) 19:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.