Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resonance Extra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resonance Extra[edit]

Resonance Extra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable radio station, Fails RADIO & GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is a classic example of WP:COI editing and it seems that the articles creator, Decodicil, is using an WP:SPA account. I am further troubled by the lack of references in this article. If anything, the article could be merged into London Musicians Collective due to the affiliation. It might help if Decodicil offers some sources while its deletion is being discussed per WP:BURDEN. Eliko007 (talk) 22:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails [WP:GNG]]. Article lacks independent reliable sources. Google and NYT searches provides nothing to establish notability. CBS527Talk 03:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.