Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resoa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resoa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software that appears to be non-notable, unable to find reliable sources to verify notability. Frmatt (talk) 04:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 04:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unable to find any reliable sources to assert notability, Lord Spongefrog, (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!) 22:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find any significant coverage in third-party sources. Unable to locate any evidence to suggest WP:IAR should be applied to this case. --Cybercobra (talk) 15:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.