Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reshoring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Offshoring#Re-shoring. sufficient consensus for a redirect DGG ( talk ) 04:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reshoring[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable neologism. Contested PROD. Article relies on a primary source to some sort of 'reshoring' web site. I suspect spam and cruft. Fiddle Faddle 22:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Offshoring#Re-shoring, where Re-shoring and Inshoring already redirect. --BDD (talk) 18:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per BDD. Quite a silly term, but now that we know that the offshoring article has content on it, that's not a good enough reason to pretend that we have nothing on this subject at all. Nyttend (talk) 16:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.