Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research of Shahnameh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. ✗plicit 00:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Research of Shahnameh[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability of the "Research of" topic. I would have merged it into the Shahnameh article but the only content appears to be some rather vague essay-like wiki-editor created text plus a quote that is not really about the topic of the article. North8000 (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think a better title would be “Shahname studies”. Just as Shakespeare studies is a recognised field of scholarship in the anglosphere, Shahname studies is a recognised field in Iran. Sourcing is likely to exist in Farsi, but without someone adding that (and ideally a bit more detail to the content) it’s hard to make a case for keeping. Mccapra (talk) 08:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify We can't verify anything in the article and it doesn't look reliable. Ben Azura (talk) 23:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or draftify as "Shahnameh studies", I guess. I'm with Mccapra. -- asilvering (talk) 06:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment happy with draftification Mccapra (talk) 06:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.