Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rerum Prussicarum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 15:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rerum Prussicarum[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It makes no sense to create a disambiguation page for book titles that have two words in common like Historia Rerum Prussicarum (which is in itself an unused redirect, for Caspar Schütz contains the only link to it while Historia Rerum Prussicarum in turn links to Caspar Schütz) and Scriptores Rerum Prussicarum. With the same right one could create disamguation pages for Historia, for Scriptores, For Historia Rerum, for Scriptores Rerum, for Prussicarum, for Rerum and so on. Pp.paul.4 (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 2 WP:PTMs. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:PTM indeed. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.