Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requiem for the Setting Sun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requiem for the Setting Sun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently released novel that does not meet notability for WP:NBOOKS. References are from publisher, reddit or author's YouTube. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC) What other sources apply to a book other than official channels dedicated to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparrow20001117 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - looking at the publisher's website, this seems to be barely removed from vanity press, if it even is. I can't find any RS reviews. Blythwood (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.