Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reputation of al qunut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Reputation of al qunut

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Reputation of al qunut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see a speedy deletion criterion that really fits here, but this article is related to Qunut, but is just a (the?) text of this prayer, without background, and with an incorrect title (hence makes no sense to redirect it to Qunut either). The "BBC" source (homepage) is useless here, and the other source[1] would be unacceptable as a reliable source anyway, but doesn't even mention Qunut, so is hardly any help. Fram (talk) 12:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Islam. Fram (talk) 12:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete - Yes, this seems to be the text of a qunūt prayer. If there were a source it might have been added to qunut, but the only 'source' used is the author's (Olaitan2022) own blog (also directly linked in-text a few times). @Fram: given that it duplicates qunut without improvement and without references, and given the nonsensical title (not useful as a redirect), I actually think that WP:A10 would have applied here? ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.