Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Georgia (1861)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 03:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Georgia (1861)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per the article itself, the only use of he term "Republic of Georgia" was by unidentified local printers on dates uncertain.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 15:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There shouldn't be discussion on deletion of these pre-CSA sovereign states (albeit unrecognized). If your point for deleting the articles is solely based on name, then discuss renaming, not deleting. For the 2012 country of Azawad, there is disagreement on the name. It doesn't mean you delete the article.—SPESH531 Other 18:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There doesn't appear to be any verifiable evidence/reliable source of the name in contemporary official use. The article has been up for 8 years without really changing the speculative/dubious nature of the name. Red Harvest (talk) 01:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If there was anything sourced in the article, it would merit a brief mention in Georgia in the American Civil War. Otherwise, it is a redundant article. bd2412 T 18:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This appears to have been lost at some point, so I've added it to today's AfD list. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is the same nonsense like what we had at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Louisiana. Neither this article nor the others on the chopping block should have been created. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.