Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reproductive Health Bill (Philippines)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I closed because it seems that my nomination was a mistake. (non-admin closure) Access Denied 09:42, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reproductive Health Bill (Philippines)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like advertising a legal bill. It doesn't really seem to fit under any CSD criteria, so I'm putting it here. Access Denied 03:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it advertising, or is it an attempt to write an article about a bill that has sparked national debate in the Philippine Star, the Philippine Daily Inquirer, the Manila Bulletin, and the Manila Standard? Uncle G (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Uncle G. This is the equivalent of the American Health care bills. There are 3 bills with their own articles. If this bill on the Philippine RH bill is deleted, I will suspect systemic bias. Klughilton4 (talk) 08:23, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.