Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative of the Cayman Islands, London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is no particular SNG reflecting this role, however, consensus here would not preclude further discussion of some material elsewhere, and possibly a redirect, based on usual editorial practices. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Representative of the Cayman Islands, London[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. has no consulate or embassy status. Article merely confirms it exists. And is simply an office in a building. "there is no flag or plaque indicating its existence, only a small label on the door-buzzer" says it all LibStar (talk) 11:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nomination. Very few embassies or diplomatic missions are notable outside the context of the relationship between the countries involved: this is less so than most, the Cayman Islands being a Crown Dependancy.TheLongTone (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Colonial governments (now overseas territories) have a diplomatic agent to represent the governement to the UK government, which is responsble for their foreign affairs. I assume that Colonial Legislation still has to be approved by the Privy Council. Getting this done would also be the responsibility of the agent. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it may be the diplomatic agent but it has no inherent notability and fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.