Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative of Saint Helena, London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Representative of Saint Helena, London[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. this does not even have embassy or consulate status. And it is only an office within the building pictured not the whole building. Diplomatic missions are not inherently notable. This was previously nominated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative of Montserrat, London LibStar (talk) 14:46, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Searches for this office on the BBC, Guardian and Telegraph websites didn't provide any sources. A Google search also doesn't find anything useful looking. I imagine that there's a highly viable article on the topic of the relationship between Saint Helena's government and the UK government, and trade, etc arrangements between Saint Helena and the UK to be written (Politics of Saint Helena and its related articles aren't very comprehensive), but this isn't it, and isn't the best basis for such an article. Nick-D (talk) 10:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - diplomatic missions are not inherently notable. St★lwart¹¹¹ 03:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. -- Calidum 05:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.