Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reportum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article doesn't even attempt to assert notability or link to sources which do. – Juliancolton | Talk 01:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reportum[edit]

Reportum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. Proposed deletion was declined without comment. Brainy J ~~ (talk) 20:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~~ (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Adverse Event Reporting System. I don't want to make any assumptions about Johngeorgewright's motivations, but the article as written appears to be a bit of a promotional piece. I'm always nervous when I see that many external links coming from a new editor working on a commercial product. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.