Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renzo Tomellini (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 03:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renzo Tomellini[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not note as an author or chemist (nothing at WorldCat and Scholar) and searches are simply finding mentions, this is essentially an advertisement. SwisterTwister talk 15:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Questionable notability at best and very considerable promotionalism. Actually, there is quite a lot at WorldCat [1]; however, none of these are actual books--,pst are conference proceedings, and his role is editor, not author. A few are technical reports, where his role is more properly compiler than author, None of them have any substantial presence in libraries,because although a few libraries may keep this material, they do not usually catalog it. Certainly does not meet WP:PROF and apparently not GNG. The only reason it was not deleted in AfD1 is that nobody commented. DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable in any of his capacities.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.