Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rent bank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 21:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rent bank[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since 2009 Rathfelder (talk) 15:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 15:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources include:
Payday Lending in Canada in a Global Context: A Mature Industry with Chronic Challenges, Jerry Buckland, Chris Robinson, Brenda Spotton Visano, Springer, 29 Mar 2018 p.165
Finding Home: Policy Options for Addressing Homelessness in Canada, The Homeless Hub, 2009 - Electronic books

Also this, this and this. Mccapra (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:12, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment most of the content reads as marketing material for Surrey Rent Bank and must be removed. The topic itself is probably notable, but I know nothing about it. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was added by a SRBteamlead - I've just removed the promotional material. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:03, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 17:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - so notability is well-demonstrated by the sources above. Power-enwiki and his battleaxe of anti-promotionalism have...aggressively cleansed the article. There's loads more content that could be added if it's now felt to be too short.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.