Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato Cipriano

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:43, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Renato Cipriano[edit]

Renato Cipriano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Individual does not meet notability criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO. ... discospinster talk 01:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 01:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 01:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Article in another language that is a clear attempt to use Wikipedia as a means of promotion. Plus, the creator is almost surely a paid editor who creates articles for non-notable people as a means for promotion. The article doesn't meet WP:GNG either.--SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 01:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete: Spam. G11 is the solution here. JavaHurricane 02:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG/BIO by a country mile Spiderone 09:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.