Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/René Sotelo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

René Sotelo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Uninmportant. Clearly self-promotion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.203.6.56 (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP nominator. Above text is copied from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 05:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 05:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 05:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing here demonstrates meeting the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most of the references, if not all, appear not to be independent, meaning that his article would fail WP:GNG. I'm inclined to vote for deletion. --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.