Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remya Panickar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only keep !vote cited the guideline out of context and was not able to demonstrate significant roles nor coverage. So Why 14:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remya Panickar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not enough in-depth sources to show she passes WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't meet WP:NACTOR Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This one depends on the interpretation of WP:NACTOR. She is listed in the cast of a number of significant films, but typically somewhere down the cast list, not starring roles. So, where is the cutoff for 'significant role'? I'm a bit confused that she is listed as a 'heroine' for the film Happy Wedding, but the wiki page on the film doesn't mention her. Neither does the IMDB page. She would still be notable if she had a significant fan base or cult following, and I consider the large fan base to be plausible.The fan base may be evidenced by Malayam sources that I can't read. If she passes WP:NACTOR for this reason, could someone please add information on this to the article? I don't wish to vote delete out of ignorance, so put this forward as a comment. Ross-c (talk) 08:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable actress who has acted in blink and you miss roles. The heroine of Happy Wedding was Drishya Raghunath, the female character with the most screentime was Anu Sithara and Delna Davis had a small but significant role as well. Most of the information in the article is unreferenced as well. I can also assure you that she has no cult following in Kerala, and I would be surprised if anybody even recognises her as an actress. Jupitus Smart 10:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 19:16, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Among the 3 criteria's of The WP:NACTOR policy, one criteria says an "actor is considered as notable If they have acted in multiple notable films" as per this revision [1] under filmography section, the actress is credited for four films. The four films in which the actor had acted have a standalone article of their own it , this means the actor have acted in multiple notable films thus they pass WP:NACTOR. Anoptimistix (talk) 12:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - actually, agf you mistakenly quoted the policy, which actually reads: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films" (emphasis mine). Which certainly doesn't apply in this case.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.