Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rembert Duine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. 120.23.43.133 (talk) 10:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rembert Duine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Seems to fail WP:PROF gidonb (talk) 01:20, 29 October 2014 (UTC)~~[reply]

Withdrawn - If this can work under WP:PROF, than I have no objection to the article! gidonb (talk) 09:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Lots of first author papers in the Physical Review family, h-index 22 (WoS) with several papers having >100 citations. This fulfills WP:PROF c1. Agricola44 (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.