Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 12:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reliv[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the citations in this article can't even be called "coverage". Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Unable to find anything else but marketing materials. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A run-of-the-mill business with no indications of notability. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.